Assignments, personal statements, application essays. Your essay borrows its sentence structure from published essayists, so it reads like a person arguing, not a model summarizing. Sample: language-learning essay, AI 100% → Human 90%.
Same detector, same day, same account. Not the best runs picked out: the failed attempts are in the log too.
| Document | Words | Draft | After | Flagged sentences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample master's thesis, ch. 1–4 (regulation comparison) | 9,017 | AI 100% | Human 90% | 0 of first 10 shown |
| Sample master's thesis, ch. 5–7 (data, discussion) | 4,263 | AI 100% | Human 89% | rescan 88–89 |
| Language-learning essay (one page) | 622 | AI 100% · 21/23 | Human 90% | 0 of 35 |
| Stablecoin policy brief (one page) | 471 | AI 100% · 16/16 | Human 90% | 0 of 16 |
| Encyclopedic article on tea (one page) | 774 | AI 100% · 23/23 | Human 90% | 0 of 36 |
On our measured documents, yes: Human 89–90% on a 12,800-word thesis and 90% on three one-page tests. We publish every result, including the failures, on the results page. Under 90 your credits come back.
Yes. The facts, order and claims stay. What changes is the sentence structure, which is what detectors read. The style of the human donor text will show.
It depends on your rules. If your school or employer forbids AI drafting, do not use it. If AI drafting is allowed, neepora keeps a machine-sounding draft from being judged on its sound rather than its content.
No. Those break with the next detector update and are dishonest. We change sentence structure only.
